Saturday, February 16, 2008

New PA Poll - How Should We Give Exxon a Hand for Sponsoring the Upcoming Achorage Symphony Concert?

Each Anchorage Symphony Orchestra concert has a corporate sponsor. The January concert was sponsored by Conoco-Phillips, whose presence in ads, goodwill-creating event underwriting and such is very high profile. The February concert will be underwritten by Exxon-Mobil, a company known for its generally low profile in recent years. The concert will be Saturday, February 23, three and a half days before the U.S. Supreme Court hears opening arguments in Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker (07-219), better known in Alaska as the class action lawsuit over the Exxon Valdez oilspill and aftermath.

At each of these concerts, a spokesperson for the orchestra announces the current evening's underwriter to the audience, and asks for the audience to thank the sponsor for such generosity. Last season, when we were asked to thank Exxon, many in the audience sat with their hands folded, while most others clapped - some loudly. I heard a little bit of hissing, and I booed Exxon loudly.

Progressive Alaska's new poll asks questions about what one should do next Saturday, when the audience is asked to applaud a company many Alaskans continue to believe to be a corporate monster. I have many friends who have not been compensated justly for their material losses from the destruction caused by the spill, let alone the other hardships they and their families have endured.

The concert will feature the Alaska premiere of a new work, Piano Concerto No. 3, by Lowell Liebermann. Eighteen orchestras, including the Anchorage Symphony, have teamed up to commission and perform the concerto, written for pianist Jeffrey Biegel. Tom Strini, music critic of the Milwaukee Journal Sentinal, wrote of Liebermann's premiere there, "The big crowd...cheered the world premiere of Lowell Liebermann's striking Piano Concerto No. 3...the orchestra played this challenging new scored with the conviction it deserves...Arresting effects abound...They work within a large alternation of ferocity and tenderness that grows more and more affecting as the music unfolds."

The last new piano concerto commissioned and premiered by the Anchorage Symphony was my own, back in March, 2004. The orchestra has greatly honored me with their renditions of three orchestral and five chamber works of mine at their concerts over the past 18 years, more than by any other living composer. Randall Craig Fleischer, the ASO Music Director, is the most enthusiastic supporter of new music in the history of this ensemble. Randy's own new work, Triumph, was just that - a triumph - at its premiere here 13 months ago.

The orchestra will also give the Anchorage premiere of what many believe to be the greatest symphony written by a native-born American in the 20th Century, the Third Symphony of Aaron Copland. It has long been my favorite American symphony. The finale of the work begins with a rendition of Copland's most famous utterance, the Fanfare for the Common Man:



Copland wrote the Fanfare during World War II. He began writing the 3rd Symphony late in the war, finishing it shortly afterward. During the 1930s, Copland was heavily involved with many left-wing causes. In the McCarthy era, Copland ran afoul of McCarthy and the House of UnAmerican Activities. Here's how it went, when Copland was called to the stand:

McCarthy sought to discover why the composer was hired to give US embassy-sponsored lectures on music in Latin America and Italy.

McCarthy asked: "If you were a member of the Communist Party, let's assume you were, and you were selected to lecture you would be bound to try wherever you could to sell the communist idea, wouldn't you?"

"No doubt," Copland replied. A moment later he turned the tables, declaring: "I had no fear of sitting down at a table with a known communist because I was so sure of my position as a loyal American."

The senator pounced: "With what known communists have you sat down at a table?"

Well, replied Copland, there were the Soviet composers he had met during his international musical career. "I assume they are communists," he said.

Copland was not asked to return for public hearings.

How would Copland have dealt with an Exxon-sponsored event in which his fanfare for people like the common fishermen and fisherwomen of Cordova, Tatitlik, Valdez, Seward, Seldovia, Homer, Kodiak and a host of other communities is being played?

I'm planning on crying "SHAME!!!" when Exxon is named. What do you think? And, go ahead and take the poll if you wish.

image of oiled hand - ADN
Aaron Copland by candlelight, studio in the Berkshires, September, 1946
, Mrs. Victor Kraft - Library of Congress

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

They can quit appealing anything that doesn't go in their favor, then sponsor the arts. I am disgusted. I can't afford to go, but yell a little louder for me since I can't be there.

Philip Munger said...

anon,

Will do!

Anonymous said...

With respect, you are proposing a response which is weak. Oil companies truly enjoy seeing weak protest. Do not give them the satisfaction. Better to relax and enjoy some good music at their expense, an expense they would not bear if it were not tax deductible. ...and keep writing, a far more effective act.

Philip Munger said...

pb,

If I knew what better to do, I might. For Bobby Van Brocklyn, a friend who killed himself in frustration in the aftermath, I simply can't keep silent.

Anonymous said...

Phillip:

Have you written about Bobby Van Brocklyn?

Philip Munger said...

pb,

I haven't, but remember reading about it when he died. He's not the only person I knew or knew well who has passed waiting, waiting...

Did you know Bob?

Anonymous said...

Phillip

No, I did not know Bob, and hope that you tell the story. When the spill happened, I was in northwest Alaska. And had worked for Dennis Kelso for a time, before he became DEC commissioner. Good man.

All those families hit so hard.

Steve said...

Maybe spilling oil over the seats in the Atwood before the concert would bring things home, about them fouling Alaska.

I suspect many people would be more outraged by what you did - disturbed their concert going and 'their' concert hall - than they were about what Exxon did.

Perhaps you can do this symbollically, maybe tiny baggies with a little oil in them dropped from the balcony. Or have 40 people scattered around the PAC and when people are asked to applaud, these forty people throw the little baggies to all the people around them. Maybe with a tiny map of Alaska in the baggie with the oil.

Just catching up with my blog reading... well not even catching up.

Steve said...

My wife said I should clarify I was thinking of tiny ZIPLOCK baggies with a few drops of oil. Nothing that would actually get on anyone. Nothing that they could charge you with. Or if they did, that would stick.

Philip Munger said...

steve,

I still don't know what I'm going to do there tomorrow night. I wish I had a cell phone with a video camera, so I could document just what does happen.