We got the letter and Senator Begich will have it today, if he doesn’t already. We’ll get you a response shortly.
Thanks - David
As Mark prepares his response, I've decided to keep him updated. I've just sent the following letter to him (I'm in Seattle, so unable to visit his local office):
March 11, 2011
Hon. Sen. Mark Begich
144 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Sen. Begich,
Your Chief-of-Staff, David Ramseur, informed me Wednesday morning that, in the matter of my March 8th letter to you regarding U.S. Army PFC Bradley Manning’s incredibly harsh treatment “We got the letter and Senator Begich will have it today, if he doesn’t already. We’ll get you a response shortly.”
As you continue to prepare to “respond shortly,” I thought you might appreciate being updated on how others in positions of responsibility, authority or concern for Manning’s treatment (as you are), are reacting.
1). Two independent reports emerged late Thursday that United States Assistant Secretary of State for Public Affairs, P. J. Crowley, observed, according to his updated Wikipedia entry:According to multiple first-hand accounts, Crowley told an audience of about twenty people at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Center for Future Civic Media on March 10, 2011 that accused WikiLeaks source Bradley Manning was being "mistreated" in Defense Department custody, and that the Defense Department's treatment of Manning "is ridiculous and counterproductive and stupid." When asked if his comments were on the record, Crowley replied: "Sure."
2). Amnesty International, perhaps the most important international human rights non-governmental organization in the world, has been protesting Manning’s treatment to Secretary of Defense Robert Gates since January. On Thursday, they went further:In late January, Amnesty International wrote a letter to Defense Secretary Robert Gates denouncing the conditions of Bradley Manning's detention as "unnecessarily harsh and punitive" and in "breach the USA’s obligations under international standards and treaties." In the wake of the prolonged forced nudity to which Manning is now being subjected, Amnesty has escalated its denunciations: as the Associated Press put it today, the group is now "urging people to complain to the Obama administration about the confinement."
In particular, Amnesty said that "the conditions inflicted on Bradley Manning . . . amount to inhumane treatment by the US authorities" and "appear to breach the USA’s human rights obligations." As a result, the group is encouraging as many Americans as possible to demand an end to these conditions (independent of Amnesty, there is a planned protest outside the Quantico brig on March 20, expected to be fairly large in size, with others being planned at military detention facilities around the country for later dates). In case anyone is wondering what Amnesty is: it's the world's premiere human rights organization which Democrats once held up as authoritative on issues on detainee abuse circa 2001- January 20, 2009.
I will continue to provide you updates on how others are reacting to PFC Manning’s un-American treatment, as you continue to prepare to “respond shortly.”
Hopefully, Sen. Begich is approaching this important issue with the same seriousness as has his colleague in the lower House, Rep. Dennis Kucinich.