Sunday, October 18, 2009

Obama's Grim Reapers


[President Obama has expanded the role played by private contractors in both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. These companies operate above and beyond our laws, and the Obama administration is quietly opposing ongoing legislative efforts by people like Sen. Al Franken to call these corporate criminals to account. Here is a guest post by Sherwood Ross]

--- by Sherwood Ross

Since taking office, President Obama has sanctioned at least 41 Central Intelligence Agency (C.I.A.) drone strikes in Pakistan that have killed between 326 and 538 people, many of them, critics say, “innocent bystanders, including children,” according to reliable reports. The drone is a remotely controlled, unmanned aircraft.

“Even if a precise account is elusive,” writes Jane Mayer in the October 26th The New Yorker, “the outlines are clear: the C.I.A. has joined the Pakistani intelligence service in an aggressive campaign to eradicate local and foreign militants, who have taken refuge in some of the most inaccessible parts of the country.”

Based on a study just completed by the non-profit, New America Foundation of Washington, D.C., “the number of drone strikes has risen dramatically since Obama became President,” Mayer reports.

In fact, the first two strikes took place on Jan. 23, the President’s third day in office and the second of these hit the wrong house, that of a pro-government tribal leader that killed his entire family, including three children, one just five years of age.

At any time, the C.I.A. apparently has “multiple drones flying over Pakistan, scouting for targets,” the magazine reports. So many Predators and its more heavily armed companion, the Reaper, are being purchased that defense manufacturer General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, of Poway, Calif., can hardly make them fast enough. The Air Force is said to possess 200.

Mayer writes, “the embrace of the Predator program has occurred with remarkably little public discussion, given that it represents a radically new and geographically unbounded use of state-sanctioned lethal force.” Today, Mayer writes, “there is no longer any doubt that targeted killing has become official U.S. policy.” And according to Gary Solis, who teaches at Georgetown University’s Law Center, nobody in the government calls it assassination. “Not only would we have expressed abhorrence of such a policy a few years ago; we did,” Solis is quoted as saying.

David Kilcullen, a counter-insurgency warfare authority who co-authored a study for the Center for New American Security, of Washington, D.C., has suggested the drone attacks have backfired. As he told The New Yorker, “Every one of these dead non-combatants represents an alienated family, a new revenge feud, and more recruits for a militant movement that has grown exponentially even as drone strikes have increased.”

And because of the C.I.A. program’s secrecy, Mayer writes, “there is no visible system of accountability in place, despite the fact that the agency has killed many civilians inside a politically fragile, nuclear-armed country with which the U.S. is not at war.”

The New Yorker further reports the Obama Administration has also expanded the sphere of authorized drone assaults in Afghanistan. An August Senate Foreign Relations Committee report said the Pentagon’s list of approved terrorist targets held 367 names and included some 50 Afghan drug lords “who are suspected of giving money to help finance the Taliban,” Mayer reports. She quotes the Senate report as stating, “There is no evidence that any significant amount of the drug proceeds goes to Al Qaeda.”

It is the military’s version of the drone assaults that operates in Afghanistan and Iraq, while the C.I.A.’s drones hunt terror suspects in countries where U.S. troops are not based and is “aimed at terror suspects around the world,” Mayer writes. The C.I.A. effort was launched by Obama’s predecessor, and a former aide to President George W. Bush says Obama has left nearly all the key personnel in place.

Running the C.I.A. program is a team of operators that handle Predator flights off runways in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Once aloft, the Predators are passed over to controllers at C.I.A. headquarters in Langley, Va., who maneuver joysticks and monitor events from a live video feed from the drone’s camera.

The magazine article reports the government plans to commission “hundreds more” of the drones, including “new generations of tiny ‘nano’ drones, which can fly after their prey like a killer bee through an open window.”

(Sherwood Ross is a Miami-based writer who formerly worked for the Chicago Daily News and other major dailies. Reach him at sherwoodross10@gmail.com)



image - Jason Jeffreys

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

"drone strikes in Pakistan that have killed between 326 and 538 people, many of them, critics say, “innocent bystanders, including children,” according to reliable reports."

Which "critics" ? Which "reliable reports" ? Seems like PA is just pimping Taliban propaganda. And once again the progressive Left shows that their sympathies lie with the homophobic, misogynistic, anti-semitic barbarians who wish to drag the world back to the Dark Ages. Who cares if the Taliban throw acid into the faces of Afghan schoolgirls.....the important thing to the Left is that the Taliban are anti-American.....that alone gains them support from today's "progressives".

Anonymous said...

" She quotes the Senate report as stating, “There is no evidence that any significant amount of the drug proceeds goes to Al Qaeda.”

This is just splitting hairs. If the money doesn't go to AQ it goes to the Taliban who are perhaps more fundamentalist than AQ. Let's not forget that the Taliban want a GLOBAL islamic caliphate. They kill women for playing music or baring their legs in public. They have thrown acid in the faces of pre-teenage girls for daring to attend school. They have stoned women and gays to death for being "un-islamic". They have forced 12 year old boys to behead unarmed Pakistani military POWS. The Taliban should be the Left's worst nightmare but instead we are supposed to feel sympathy for them because drones are killing their leaders ?

Anonymous said...

Taliban and Progressives are friends, they have the same enemy...America.

Celia Harrison said...

Thank you for telling the truth about Afghanistan and Pakistan. The Taliban is a local organization which no one is saying are good guys. They were started to fight against invaders such as the Russians which they were very successful against. The people don't really like them, but they are better than all the tyrants who have invaded them over the years. For them they are the better of two evils. We have no reason to be at war with the Taliban, they are a very local organization. What would we do if another country invaded us? We have had a part in making human rights worse for women in the area and are killing civilians. I am disgusted that Obama is continuing to use private contractors for military efforts. The miliatary is creating more enemies for our country and making life worse for the people in Afghanistan. The other side effect is the low cost Heroin that has flooded the world.

Anonymous said...

"We have no reason to be at war with the Taliban, they are a very local organization. What would we do if another country invaded us?"

You mean what would we do if a bunch of guys trained in Taliban-controlled Afghanistan killed 3,000 American citizens in a murderous attack? I'm guessing you don't get much in the way of news where you live. Even the great anti-American, Obama, has said that the war in Afghanistan is one we have to win.

"but they are better than all the tyrants who have invaded them over the years."

And you know this from experience ?
The people who treat women as cattle, ban all art and all music, behead children, throw acid in the faces of 7 year old girls, stone women to death are, in your mind, better than American soldiers, German doctors and Canadian engineers. Sick.

"We have had a part in making human rights worse for women in the area and are killing civilians."

That's a complete and utter lie. Until the Taliban were overthrown women were killed for driving cars, wearing make-up, etc. etc. If you think that the Taliban are so great why don't you volunteer to spend a year in a Taliban-controlled area and them come back and tell us how wonderful your life as a woman was.