Tuesday, January 8, 2008

The Most Gagged Person in U.S. History

The woman in this picture looks unlikely for that title, but she is "the most gagged person in U.S. history." She looks more like Governor Sarah Palin's younger sister, or Palin herself, without glasses.

Her name is Sibel Edmonds. If you haven't heard of her it is because our government - and several others - don't want you to hear her, hear of her or read what she's read.

This is the first story I've taken up at Progressive Alaska that doesn't appear to have an Alaska connection. But her story appears to be the truth, and even though she's under several court orders not to tell it, it appears she started doing that over the past weekend. Not to the U.S. mainstream press, but to The Sunday Times of London. Although newspapers in Israel, India, Pakistan and other places have started repeating her weekend Times story, or parts of it, no U.S. newspaper of record has even alluded to it yet. I.N.N. Video News covered the story today.

Edmonds, a naturalized U.S. citizen from Azerbaijan, began working for the FBI shortly after September 11, 2001. She speaks Turkish, Farsi and Azerbaijani. She was set to work translating some of the incredible number of untranslated telephone intercepts at the FBI, as they attempted to play catch-up after the 9/11 intelligence fiasco. When she started asking supervisors inconvenient questions about information she was putting together, she was terminated from her job. She has won every hearing since having to do with her job performance. Nobody has poked a hole yet into any information she has divulged.

The Edmonds article at wikipedia hasn't been updated lately, but it is informative. There is a blog devoted to her chronicle, and several hundred blogs around the planet have picked up on the Times story. Justin Raimondo wrote an excellent essay on the Times revelations, and Brad Friedman at BradBlog is in touch with Edmonds through the beginning of this week. YouTube has an excellent cache of interviews and talks featuring Sibel Edmonds. Daniel Ellsberg has been an outspoken advocate for Edmonds.

Here's the essence of her new revelations:

Edmonds described how foreign intelligence agents had enlisted the support of US officials to acquire a network of moles in sensitive military and nuclear institutions.

Among the hours of covert tape recordings, she says she heard evidence that one well-known senior official in the US State Department was being paid by Turkish agents in Washington who were selling the information on to black market buyers, including Pakistan.

The name of the official – who has held a series of top government posts – is known to The Sunday Times. He strongly denies the claims.

However, Edmonds said: “He was aiding foreign operatives against US interests by passing them highly classified information, not only from the State Department but also from the Pentagon, in exchange for money, position and political objectives.”

She claims that the FBI was also gathering evidence against senior Pentagon officials – including household names – who were aiding foreign agents.

“If you made public all the information that the FBI have on this case, you will see very high-level people going through criminal trials,” she said.

Her story shows just how much the West was infiltrated by foreign states seeking nuclear secrets. It illustrates how western government officials turned a blind eye to, or were even helping, countries such as Pakistan acquire bomb technology.

The wider nuclear network has been monitored for many years by a joint Anglo-American intelligence effort. But rather than shut it down, investigations by law enforcement bodies such as the FBI and Britain’s Revenue & Customs have been aborted to preserve diplomatic relations.

The Turks and Israelis had planted “moles” in military and academic institutions which handled nuclear technology. Edmonds says there were several transactions of nuclear material every month, with the Pakistanis being among the eventual buyers. “The network appeared to be obtaining information from every nuclear agency in the United States,” she said.

They were helped, she says, by the high-ranking State Department official who provided some of their moles – mainly PhD students – with security clearance to work in sensitive nuclear research facilities. These included the Los Alamos nuclear laboratory in New Mexico, which is responsible for the security of the US nuclear deterrent.

Edmonds has today posted pictures of most of the main figures in her narrative.

If there is some sort of Alaska connection to her story, it might be in the parallels involving the FBI being thwarted in pursuing a criminal investigation or investigations. Ray Metcalfe has told me that the White House attempted to shut down the Alaska GOP legislative corruption probe in early 2007. Metcalfe, like Edmonds, has been avoided by the mainstream press.

Sunday, January 6, 2008

More Federal Alaska GOP Corruption Indictments? - a Poll

Everyone from Ethan Berkowitz to Sheila Toomey has mentioned that more indictments are looming in the GOP political corruption case(s) here. I've heard so many rumors since October, I can't remember them all. We do know some people have had their offices or homes searched. Others have stated that they are under investigation by the FBI. A few have all but disappeared off the face of the earth.

I'm going to take a poll. It is off at the top of the right-hand side of the page. If I've left anyone out, feel free to comment, and I'll add the person if he or she seems credible. You can vote on more than one item in the poll.

Rick Smith and attorney - photo by Al Grillo, AP

Learning to Skate Ski

Judy and I have been Nordic skiing since 1976. For a long time, we used waxless "fish-scale" skis. They were perfect for the coastal areas and islands of Prince William Sound, where we lived when we started skiing. When our son started competing for the Nordic Ski Team at Colony High School, we began to appreciate how graceful and fast skate skis are.

Judy got set up for skate skiing last winter, and I got a hand-me-down set from my son. Good equipment.

I've ice skated since high school. I ice skate a lot on Neklason Lake, where we live. I also skate on in-line skates in the summer. So I thought I'd pick right up on skate skiing. Today was my first lesson.

I felt totally helpless for the first half hour of skiing. I couldn't get the skis to grab when I tried to push back in the skating motion, and kept on using my poles one at a time, like in the Nordic classic style.

After the first half hour, I got a little better, receiving compliments from Barb, my instructor, who was skiing circles around me. But I still felt totally hapless, as I watched other skiers zip on by. We had to quit, to go to Eagle River and watch Charlie Wilson's War. I'll get it, eventually.

This was my first time at the facilities at Beach Lake, across from Chugiak High School. The area has a big set of trails and a wonderful chalet for warming and changing clothes.

ice frost on birches above Neklason Lake

Saturday, January 5, 2008

Meet and Greet Rep. Don Young

I read that Don Young is planning to meet and greet his constituents in Alaska through this coming week or so, similarly to how he met and greeted constituents in Fairbanks last week. There's no information on this at his official U.S. House site, but his schedule is posted at his campaign site. Here it is:

We invite you to come join Congressman Don Young as he travels throughout the state.

January 7, 2008
Valley Under 40 Meet and Greet
Evangelo's Restaurant
Mile 40 Parks Highway
5:30-7:30

January 9, 2008
Kenai Meet and Greet
Challenger Learning Center
9711 Kenai Spur Hwy
6:00-8:00

January 10, 2008
Anchorage Meet and Greet
Sourdough Mining Company
5200 Juneau Street
5:30-7:30

For further information contact Alaskans for Don Young at (907) 563-431

This is distinctly different from how Rep. Young has handled any campaign in the past. For instance, in his Alaska travels as late as October of 2006, he insisted he was traveling as our congressman, not as a candidate. But these upcoming activities are clearly being handled by, and one would hope, are being paid for by his 2008 campaign fund.

Now's your chance to meet and greet your congressman! I'll be there at Evangelo's.

image for Progressive Alaska by Darkblack

An Open Letter to Robert Dillon

Robert Dillon is an award-winning Washington, D.C.-based reporter. His day job is as Political Reporter for The Oil Daily. He also frequently writes for The Fairbanks News-Miner, where he used to be their State Reporter. He's won seven Alaska Press Club awards for reporting or photography, and a National Press Photographers Association award.

Robert's blog, Alaskan Abroad, is the second place I check every day, after looking at the Anchorage Daily News. If you haven't visited his blog, you should. Alaskan Abroad is listed here as an Alaska Progressive Blog. Dillon is less progressive on some issues than most other blogs listed there, but I consider him not only highly professional, but one of the most honest reporters we have on Alaska issues. Because of the latter of those attributes, he ends up being more progressive than a lot of the people he interviews in D.C.

I've commented from time to time at his blog, and he finally commented here yesterday. Dillon was miffed about my mildly humorous Kos post and poll, saying "All humor aside, what the f*$k do we care what some liberal Outside blogger thinks is good for Alaska? Is Kos going to care when the heat gets shut off in Tuntituliak?"

An excellent point. I have no idea how Markos Moulitsas would care about that. He might. But Robert pushed a button when he next wrote "Hate earmarks all you want, but the delegation has delivered for Alaskans."

Dear Robert,

Irrespective of whether or not Don Young, Ted Stevens and Lisa Murkowski have "delivered for Alaskans," it is past time for Young and Stevens to go. As for Sen. Murkowski, I felt she was one of the few sensible Republicans in our State Legislature when she was there, and was a better U.S. Senator than her dad ever was within days of her accepting his appointment to his former job.

I've known Ted Stevens since 1973, when I first interviewed him for KLAM Radio in Cordova about fishery issues. I've met him several times since, had lunch with him a couple of times, dedicated some songs for children to him, watched him accept fishing flies my six-year-old son had tied for him, and corresponded with his office since 1978. I campaigned for him in 1978, and have voted for him twice.

Sen. Stevens has done some great things for Alaska, the USA and the world. Perhaps some of the most important things he's done haven't registered with Alaskans, most notably, the role he played up until the Bush administration stole the presidency, in assuring the demise of the Soviet Union's nuclear infrastructure was closely monitored and dealt with sensibly. The Bushistas could give a shit, Robert.

Ted Stevens saved the National Endowment of the Arts and Public Broadcasting more than once. He's pro-choice.


But Ted Stevens has failed our coastal community infrastructure. He was instrumental in pushing for Valdez tankers to be able to leave the tanker navigation lanes at the bottom of Valdez Arm. He has constantly enabled a few supporters to take over our offshore fishery industry, and supported regulations that made local shore-based fish processing in small communities untenable or statutorily impossible.

He has rubber-stamped most of George Bush's policies that have mired us in an extended war in which if we return to how bad it was three years ago, it looks really good. He has supported the consolidation of media that leaves our communities without locally controlled news and emergency information access. His tenure up to 2006 in the field of telecommunication oversight nationally was an unmitigated disaster.

Sen. Stevens does not have six years of mental stability left in him. I've watched him drift in and out of acuity for years, but it is on the verge of getting out of hand.

Representative Don Young is far, far worse. When he was responsible for the welfare of the citizens of the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, he sold their and the guest workers there into a criminally-connected slave regime that will take years to undo. For that alone, he's the worst bad act our state has inflicted on the national soul.

He has consistently lied to you and me about the depth of his ties to Jack Abramoff. He has been an even thicker, inkier rubber stamp for the worst president in the history of our Republic than has been Sen. Stevens.

You say "the delegation has delivered for Alaska." This is true for some, but we have no way of knowing whether or not somebody else in their offices would have done better for us all. I hope we get a chance to find that out soon.

photo of Robert Dillon by Robert Dillon

Friday, January 4, 2008

One Down, How Many to Go?


Barack Obama pulled it off. I remember watching him on C-SPAN last summer, giving speeches at County Fairs and hog calling contests. And a few times since.

IBEW has hosted Obama training sessions here, and although Hillary Clinton has supposedly spent the most money in Alaska so far of any Democratic Party candidate, I'm more interested in Obama after watching him during this Iowa campaign.

Edwards is my guy, and the candidate I'll caucus for here in February, but we could sure do a lot worse than Obama.

The figure for the amount all the candidates from both parties spent on TV ads is over $50,000,000, and the bills aren't all out yet. That is more than all candidates to all statewide contests in Alaska have spent on all their elections put together here in 49 years.

you can sign up to help with the Alaska Democratic Party caucuses here.

Thursday, January 3, 2008

Progressive Alaska's Daily Kos Ted Stevens Poll

Yesterday's post here had a poll attached regarding Sen. Ted Stevens' chances for re-election in Alaska, even if he's indicted before the 2008 election. I posted the same essay at the national political blog, DailyKos. But I framed the questions a little bit differently, realizing most readers would be from other parts of the country than Alaska.

Polls are interesting, to say the least. 2008 may be the year during which Americans get polled more than any previous year in our history. Looking at today's news from Iowa, we have more polls than caucus-goers, it seems. And the polls show any number of candidates winning both GOP and Democratic contests.

My two polls - the one here yesterday and the one at DailyKos, are no more scientific than polls of TV viewers by stations like KTUU, or by Ivan Moore, for examples. And, unlike theirs, my Kos poll had a couple layers of humor in it. Here are the results, so far:

Will Alaskans Return Ted Stevens to the U.S. Senate, Even If He's Indicted Before the November 2008 Election?

17%8 votes
14%7 votes
25%12 votes
42%20 votes

Some of the comments at the Kos post are hilarious - as usual. As I said yesterday, "It is often difficult to explain Alaska to outsiders."

Wednesday, January 2, 2008

How Stupid Do Kos and NRO Really Think Alaskans Are? - PA's First Poll

It is often difficult to explain Alaska to outsiders. The flap over the bridges to nowhere was an excellent example. People in the lower 48 usually perceive Alaska as vast, which it certainly is. But when they read of Alaska in the news, much of the interest is directed toward a few small but important areas within the state: Prudhoe Bay, Juneau, Anchorage, or Barrow, for instance. When the bridge issue hit national news, I read at blog after blog - mostly left-wing ones - about how absurd it would have been to spend hundreds of millions of dollars on two bridges between a small town or a small city and "nowhere."

Several times I pointed out that most new bridges built here are very close to "nowhere." We have less road mileage in Alaska than exists in Rhode Island. Less new road miles have been added to our system here in the 35 years I've been in Alaska, than are added to the greater Chicago road systems every three or four months.

Not only can outsiders' ignorance of Alaska and Alaskans be profound, so can be the memes about our selfishness, greed and insularity. Last night our family watched The Simpsons Movie. The scene where the border guard hands Homer $1,000.00 for showing up is funny, but many outsiders' views of Alaska and of what is good for Alaskans is at least that simplistic.

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote about Markos Moulitsas' ridiculous statement accompanying his United 2000 poll on the AK-AL U.S. House race, and some of the web ramifications of Markos' inaccuracy. Some of the comments my essay got were hilarious. I enjoyed this one:

"....Kos clearly knows who is the best candidate for Alaska...."

This from somebody signing off as Bill D in SF, defending Kos, who lives in the Bay area himself. A Minnesota commenter, bringing up Alaska's Patron Saint, Ted Stevens, shared the following:

"Saw a high school friend last summer who's lived in Anchorage for the last fifteen years. She's still left of center but her husband isn't. They have business with the gov't, and surprised me by saying that while she wouldn't be sorry to see Young get kicked to the curb, she still saw a lot of support for Uncle Ted, and that even an indictment would not be enough to get many to not vote for him, herself included."

In today's Anchorage Daily News Newsreader, Terry Carr linked to a National Review Online article by John J. Miller, a National Political Correspondent there, where Miller says pretty much the same thing:

"If 84-year-old Republican senator Ted Stevens is indicted in a corruption probe — FBI and IRS agents searched his home last year — then the reign of the longest-serving GOP senator could share the fate of his ballyhooed “bridge to nowhere.” But Stevens is brassy enough to keep on running no matter what, and Alaskans probably like their pork enough to elect him anyway."

Alaskan and outside writers have pointed to the November 2006 re-election of GOP Rep. Vic Kohring of Wasilla to the Alaska House, after his office had been targeted for a search by the FBI, in the summer of 2006 as an example backing contentions such as Miller's. Kohring beat a highly respected ex-legislator, the iconic Katie Hurley. And he beat her soundly, even after the search should have sent red flags to Kohring's constituents.

At the conclusion of Kohring's trial, I bumped into John Davies, my business law professor from over 20 years ago. Davies is now Chief of Staff for GOP Rep. Wes Keller, who was appointed to Kohring's house seat after Kohring's July, 2007 resignation. Davies, was emphatic that the Feds should have given Kohring a pass, citing the tremendous resources that had been brought to bear against "this one, fine man."

I disagreed with Davies, who was an excellent business law prof, but seemed to be missing something important. "They weren't after Vic, they just trolled him up as bycatch," I said. "They've taken oaths to uphold the constitution. Do you think they should have ignored their oaths?"

John replied with that day's version of IOKIYAR (It's OK if you're a Republican), again citing the costs. I said, "Well, if the Feds can blow $50,000,000 investigating a hummer under the oval office desk, don't you think they can spend $1,000,000 investigating corrupt legislation?"

Davies had no answer that would satisfy me. "Clinton lied under oath," he replied. John wasn't the only person dissatisfied with the Kohring verdict. That same day, in the comments to an ADN article about the trial, here were three:

The Only Honest Politician Destroyed
Vic Kohring is the only fully honest politician I have met, but his very lack of guile and simple, trusting character has made him an easy mark for unscrupulous thugs -- on both sides of the law.

no real proof....
I dont see any real proof of bribes. I see a man asking someone for a loan, but not a bribe. Who says that you should ask family before anyone else for a loan? In the recording I saw and is on this ADN site, Allen clearly states/asks.....is this a loan? Vic answers "yes"......

honestly dumb
Kohring knew he wasn't supposed to be taking money--even for gifts for his child. But that's all crap anyway. How many times have you had someone offer you hundreds for an easter egg hunt. Honest to goodness if this jury comes out with a not guilty verdict I'm going to be sick.

Examples like those of Davies, the woman from Minnesota's Anchorage friend, the three ADN commenters, the article in NRO, and other such things I've read and heard, make me wonder. So I've decided to create the first Progressive Alaska Poll.

I'll also post it at DailyKos. Here it is:

Will Alaskans Return Ted Stevens to the U.S. Senate if he's indicted before November?

The poll is up near the top of the right-hand margin of the blog.

Son of the North - Fred Machetanz


The Upcoming Alaska Democratic Party Presidential Caucuses

On Tuesday, February 5, in more than 100 communities around Alaska, Democrats here will join those in 20 other states in using the antiquated caucus system to determine who our delegation to the 2008 National Democratic Party Convention will nominate for President on the first ballot of voting.

It has been a while since a national convention of either party saw a true contest during those midsummer events. This week begins the process of other states choosing their delegates and nominees.

But this is the most important election year for progressive and liberal Alaskans in a long time. Although our state has never been considered key to either party's presidential electoral strategy, by participating in the Democratic Party Presidential Caucus, you can gain an understanding of how the party works in your town, community and neighborhood. To vote in the caucus, you need to be registered as a Democrat. You can do this by downloading the voter registration form from the Alaska Division of Elections web site, filling it out and either mailing it or bringing it in to one of the places listed here.

The Alaska Democratic Party web site has a lot of information on the caucuses, and contact info on where your local one will or might be.

Norman Rockwell - In The Jury Room

Tuesday, January 1, 2008

2008 - a Year We'll Remember

The hegemony over Alaskan politics by a Republican Party machine whose motto has always been "Me First After the Big Oil Companies Get Theirs" is about to end. The Federal probe into the corruption of our political system by cynics who have been constantly creating special deals for friends and family at your expense is about to throw out its next set of indictments. Chances are that they will reach higher into the ranks of sitting and former politicians and other prominent figures in Alaska and elsewhere than they so far have.

The house that Ted and Don and Frank and Randy and Lyda built is coming down. This is sad in so many ways. All five of the people I just mentioned have done some good things for us. In Ted's case, he has done many good things for people in other parts of the USA and the world.

But the house has to come down. The first pallet of 2x6's in trying to control the building of the new house was set down yesterday by GOP big oil's newest cutout figure, Rep. Kevin Meyer (R - Conoco-Phillips). Rep. Gabrielle LeDoux and Gov. Sarah Palin both have announced they intend to introduce ethics proposals.

Where are the Democrats? Three, count them, three Republicans are out there with ethics reform plans. The Democratic Party has supported the Alaskans for Clean Elections initiative, but few Democrats serving in office or running for office have been forthcoming in support of the initiative.

I'd like to see Rep. Mike Doogan come up with something, uh, revolutionary. Former Rep. Ray Metcalfe already has, by proposing that APOC be abolished, and that a new regime outside of the executive and legislative branches be put in place to police our now nationally famous political customs.