tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post7065060376191626760..comments2024-03-23T08:51:09.577-08:00Comments on Progressive Alaska: Saradise Lost - Book 2 - Chapter 67 -- Palin Legal Fund Marathon Ends in Fiasco as Her Mouthpiece Refuses to Be TransparentPhilip Mungerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14601488767955084836noreply@blogger.comBlogger32125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-52335850828210630662009-07-16T03:40:02.532-08:002009-07-16T03:40:02.532-08:00I will scan it and post it in a prominent place on...I will scan it and post it in a prominent place on the blog./......<br /><br /><br />___________________<br />Julie<br /><a href="http://www.directstartv.com/jump.html?referID=oa-0-173189" rel="nofollow">Free HD DVR Receiver Upgrade</a>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-40562964614759421102009-06-23T10:33:07.687-08:002009-06-23T10:33:07.687-08:00Juju, As a c4p'er you seem to have a tiny bit ...Juju, As a c4p'er you seem to have a tiny bit more sense than the rest of the barbarians. TRY to let some of that rub off over there. Ahhhh...nevermind...sjk from the belly of the planehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16534445418871394872noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-55802077168147811152009-06-22T21:35:42.213-08:002009-06-22T21:35:42.213-08:00Has the Cult of Palin stopped to consider that the...Has the Cult of Palin stopped to consider that the I.R.S. could declare them a religious organization, in which case their fund raising efforts would be deemed illegal.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-57492020113297684172009-06-22T21:34:51.278-08:002009-06-22T21:34:51.278-08:00besheert,
my same response to you.
Sorry that you ...besheert,<br />my same response to you.<br />Sorry that you all got all defensive. I was just trying to help as a former IRS auditor when I was responding to juju.<br />I'll not do that again.<br />apparently you know more than I do. I was being polite, go for it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-63350859013344231432009-06-22T21:27:56.007-08:002009-06-22T21:27:56.007-08:00seattle fan: gifts are are on the part of the dono...seattle fan: gifts are are on the part of the donor (gifts over $13,000 for 2009, was $12,000 for 2008).<br />See:<br />http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=108139,00.html<br />I was responding to that snarky peelander who had no idea what "gifts" meant in IRS terms. juju was going off on $150 "gifts".Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-2660717553694378632009-06-22T20:10:18.846-08:002009-06-22T20:10:18.846-08:00Anonymous@4:54:
OK - go ahead & receive a larg...Anonymous@4:54:<br />OK - go ahead & receive a large financial windfall from a CORPORATION who is paying you as a sponsor and see if the IRS isn't interested.<br /><br />All politicians including the Pres must report gifts they receive - under conditions. In this case, TAHD received racing machines and got to KEEP them. It is classed as "income" and is reportable unless of course, TAHD is the son of Mr. Cat...Arctic that is.<br /><br />There are "personal" gifts and "corporate" gifting. Why do you think the whole stink of the Pharm Companies giving note pads to docs was such a huge issue?<br /><br />Again, I would be DElighted to allow the IRS to fully investigate Ms. Grifter and her hubs, Mr. Grifter. No problem - nothing to see and move on.<br /><br />Nothing to hide? Prove it by being transparent.<br /><br />Good news is that the IRS knows all the rules. The sleds don't fall under "gifts", they fall under "INCOME".<br /><br />Busted!basheerthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00769950942470390914noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-58619579639733400962009-06-22T20:04:29.773-08:002009-06-22T20:04:29.773-08:00Great analysis and breakdown Phil! I hope all yo...Great analysis and breakdown Phil! I hope all you guys up there keep this up. Something is definitely not right about all this bs and I hope my donation to CD will help to do something about it. LOL at the irony of the echo chamber spouting off like that. If it weren't so maddening it might be a tad bit funny......but I can't find any humor at all.<br /><br />Anonymous 4:54======Nice try. I don't think it works that way at all. Would love to see the link to your info. Hahaha! Not holding my breath.<br /><br />seattlefanAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-76673344004139912382009-06-22T18:31:57.491-08:002009-06-22T18:31:57.491-08:00C4P =
Crackpots for Palin ?
Cranks for Palin ?
...C4P =<br /><br />Crackpots for Palin ?<br /><br />Cranks for Palin ?<br /><br />Cultists for Palin ?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-15934120356864405152009-06-22T16:54:28.967-08:002009-06-22T16:54:28.967-08:00per IRS website, gifts are taxable to the donor, n...per IRS website, gifts are taxable to the donor, not the recipient.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-45587103257394767392009-06-22T16:49:46.380-08:002009-06-22T16:49:46.380-08:00Nancy: the IRS is VERY interested in "gifts&...Nancy: the IRS is VERY interested in "gifts". They monitor "gifts" - most often gift tax is incurred when individuals gift cash to children or family members. I believe this was the original purpose for gift taxes.<br />Todd and SP obviously have a contract with Arctic Cat. This has nothing to do with gifting. It is a contract whereby TAHD receives equipment at cut rate prices and keeps the equipment. I believe the IRS would consider at least a portion of this as a gift or at the very least, reportable income.<br /><br />In political land....gifts are things that come to politicians that they keep. They are required by law to report the value.<br /><br />It is unrelated to gift taxes for individuals I believe. But the IRS is the BEST determinant for how this works.basheerthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00769950942470390914noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-43080411201197704222009-06-22T16:33:39.390-08:002009-06-22T16:33:39.390-08:00I believe it is the IRS that might be interested, ...I believe it is the IRS that might be interested, except for the fact that it's gifts.<br /><br />It used to be that you could accept 10k as a "gift" and as such, it wasn't considered taxable. <br /><br />So, every one of us could "GIVE" CD 10 grand apiece (IF we had it - ha!), and she'd not have to declare any of it.<br /><br />What I "donate" (give) to CD is a GIFT.N Crowleyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10294568045029536945noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-74390529834425938422009-06-22T16:27:32.235-08:002009-06-22T16:27:32.235-08:00A comment form Mudflats:
“Palin’s lawyer, Thoma...A comment form Mudflats: <br /><br /><br />“Palin’s lawyer, Thomas Van Flein, would not give a case-by-case accounting of how Palin has incurred so much legal debt, saying “that type of breakdown is protected by the attorney-client privilege.”<br />__________________________________<br /><br />Some very quick legal research suggests that statement is not supported by the common law (decisions by judges) in Alaska. <br /><br />For example, in Moudy v. Superior Court, the Court of Appeals of the State of Alaska, cited and relied on a case for the proposition that “information concerning the amount, source, and manner of payment of legal fees is not protected by the attorney-client privilege because such information does not convey the substance of confidential communications between the attorney and the client.”<br /><br />That case is here: http://touchngo.com/ap/html/ap-1605.htm<br /><br />Also, a good argument can be made that because Palin (or anyone acting on her behalf) already disclosed that she supposedly incurred a certain total amount of legal fees “debt,” any possible attorney-client privilege about the legal fees “debt” Palin incurred has been waived by Palin. <br /><br />Thus, the statement that “that type of breakdown is protected by the attorney-client privilege” is complete nonsense and finds no legally supportable justification.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-49417505157656954882009-06-22T16:08:50.943-08:002009-06-22T16:08:50.943-08:00As horrible as Sarah's fashion sense is, I do ...As horrible as Sarah's fashion sense is, I do not see her wearing red monkey shoes with an orange jumpsuit. I am sooooo looking forward to turning on the tv and seeing a re-play of IL Gov. Blago being led away in handcuffs - only replace Blago with the AK GINO. After all, she makes Blago look like a boy scout.ellanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-8665053525820703662009-06-22T16:02:19.931-08:002009-06-22T16:02:19.931-08:00"Cole said she nevertheless will put the name..."Cole said she nevertheless will put the names of all donors and the amounts they gave on the legal defense fund's public Web site four times a year, with the first posting likely in early August."<br /><br />ROFL! I'm likely to walk on the moon in August too also! :DAussie Blue Skynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-4356894302411607842009-06-22T16:01:00.416-08:002009-06-22T16:01:00.416-08:00Look we all know that the groupies over at C4P are...Look we all know that the groupies over at C4P are simply juveniles who aren't capable of rational discussion. They don't allow anyone to say anything whatsoever that might even hint at being negative towards Palin. They claim to be free from personal attacks on others, yet all one has to do is go there and read the comments and you can see the elementary school mindset and behavior. <br /><br />Just ignore it. Let them play their little games, and make their childish and immature comments. It does nothing more than show them for what they truly are, and shows exactly the kind of "supporter" that Palin attracts! That will do more to dissuade people than anything we can say or do.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-8434331804845492652009-06-22T15:42:25.304-08:002009-06-22T15:42:25.304-08:00C4P can't legally "disclose" anythin...C4P can't legally "disclose" anything because C4P doesn't control or even have access to the AFT.<br />Delusions of grandeur can be satisfying for them, however, no matter how silly the quicksand basis of their own legal opinions.<br />My fave was the C4P person who claims to have donated $5 to Diva so he/she could demand a complete accounting (including all names and donation amounts), and therefore create all sorts of diabolical legal sky is falling (including jail time for fraud) for CD. <br />How sad....sigh...justafarmernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-42928205230690427242009-06-22T15:40:23.411-08:002009-06-22T15:40:23.411-08:00crystalwolf,
She best be careful bending over to ...crystalwolf,<br /><br />She best be careful bending over to do her Naughty red monkey shoes up!! One never knows what could happen!!! LMAO!!<br /><br />I'm sure someone would gain access to a cellphone!! a la Youtube!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-26687072657343730452009-06-22T15:27:36.397-08:002009-06-22T15:27:36.397-08:00Juju
WTF do you care? Diva doesn't have to dis...Juju<br />WTF do you care? Diva doesn't have to disclose who gave to her fund,now you are claiming c4p is going to be reporting.... WHAT Kristin Cole says about GINO's Slush fund????<br />Well hopefully the whole pack of them will be in jail by then. Wonder if Naughty red monkey shoes are allowed there, Do ya know????crystalwolf aka caligrlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-8875279862681149072009-06-22T15:24:36.434-08:002009-06-22T15:24:36.434-08:00CelticDiva: Why are you feeding the JuJu troll?
F...CelticDiva: Why are you feeding the JuJu troll?<br />For heaven's sake ... it has 1 neuron and it has nothing new to say. No one CARES what JuJu says or thinks. No one wants "it" here.<br /><br />The Peeing in the Sea idiots are making up IRS rules as they go. CD is not stupid. She will be in full compliance of all rules and regulations for fund raising (which of course IS legal).<br /><br />Now about that Lunatic's transparency issue in Alaska. You know, the raving nutcase called SP? How about the Arctic Cat "gift" machines???? <br /><br />WV: BARPH!!!!basheerthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00769950942470390914noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-30117893507359890112009-06-22T15:10:51.692-08:002009-06-22T15:10:51.692-08:00Juju, read this:
http://divasblueoasis.com/showDi...Juju, read this:<br /><br />http://divasblueoasis.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=663<br /><br />PayPal keeps the information for me in a very organized fashion. As a private citizen reporting income, the IRS is the only organization I must report to.<br /><br />My accountability to my donors will be the receipt I get from the State of Alaska when I pay the bill. I will scan it and post it in a prominent place on the blog.CelticDivahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07147959367081410686noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-88670128680994963472009-06-22T14:55:15.763-08:002009-06-22T14:55:15.763-08:00@juju, why do you care?@juju, why do you care?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-47629912950700294962009-06-22T14:52:35.050-08:002009-06-22T14:52:35.050-08:00BTW, great post, Phil!
Thanks!BTW, great post, Phil!<br />Thanks!justafarmernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-5557949092575805202009-06-22T14:51:51.530-08:002009-06-22T14:51:51.530-08:00Looking forward to Diva reporting on her fund ...n...Looking forward to Diva reporting on her fund ...names and amounts of donors. C4P will be listing this info in Aug. Will Diva be reporting this as income to the IRS or does she need to file the necessary papers as a pac?jujuhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09918591051067291978noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-89479631151932014642009-06-22T14:51:09.678-08:002009-06-22T14:51:09.678-08:00C4P = Cyberstalkers for Palin?C4P = Cyberstalkers for Palin?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2083200247132907218.post-27545502806765642882009-06-22T14:49:52.016-08:002009-06-22T14:49:52.016-08:00The extent of their ignorance and faux outrage is ...The extent of their ignorance and faux outrage is astounding. <br /><br />Anon at 2:23: they clearly don't understand the basic principles of politics, fund raising, accounting, legal issues or the IRS, so they won't know how to cover their cybertracks (much like an incontinent cat trying to cover up after itself on linoleum).justafarmernoreply@blogger.com